C.S. Peirce’s Logic of Relations: Department of English and Philosophy Charles Sanders Peirce is, as Alfred Tarski has rightly reminded us, the father of the logic of relations. Although Augustus de Morgan pioneered investigation into the logic of dyadic relations as an outgrowth of his mathematical study of syllogistic, it was Peirce who first developed a general logic of relations, that is, a logic for relations of any adicity (valency) whatsoever. The corazon de corazon of this logic is Peirce’s so-called “Reduction Thesis” consisting of two controversial clauses. The first of these is a necessity clause stating that, besides monadic relations (one-place predicates) and dyadic relations, a relationally complete logic must also have genuine triadic relations, that is, three-place relations which cannot be analyzed into combinations of relations of lesser adicity. The second clause is a sufficiency clause, specifically, the claim that genuine triadic relations, together with monadic and dyadic relations, suffice for a relationally-complete logic. The means for composing all other (n>3)-adic relations are two logical operations, namely, the unary operation of auto-relative multiplication and the binary operation of relative multiplication. Peirce’s Reduction Thesis has been all but universally rejected, often even by scholars sympathetic to Peirce and his work in logic. This tutorial explicates his contentious thesis and subsequently presents two topological models for his logic of relations. One is a variant of topological graph theory, called Peircean Relational Graph Theory, and the other uses surface theory, called Peircean Relational Surface Theory. These two models provide justification for his remarkable contribution to a universal logic of relations including proofs of his Reduction Thesis, one in each model.
I. Peirce’s Logic of Relations and Peircean Relational Graph Theory
C.S. Peirce’s view that mathematics is the science of necessary reasoning about hypothetical possibilities by means diagrams will be introduced. Further, his contention that logic requires topology will be briefly examined. Peirce’s diagrammatic logic of relations will be explicated including his “Reduction Thesis,” specifically, the thesis, that a relationally complete logic requires, but only requires monadic, dyadic, and triadic relations. The fundamentals of Peircean Relational Graph Theory (PRGT), a radical variant of standard graph theory will be delineated. It will be shown that PRGT is able to represent straightforwardly both relations of one, two, and three adicities and the logical operations of auto-relative and relative multiplication. II. Garnering the First Fruits of PRGT and Those of a Later Gleaning
The representational scope and power of PRGT will be presented via relevant combinatorial formulas as well as diagrams of relational networks. Several key theorems will be demonstrated culminating in a proof of Peirce’s Composability-of-Relations Theorem (The Reduction Thesis justified). A taxonomy of general varieties of relational networks willed be tabulated. As a preamble and a propaedeutic to the third session, surface diagrams which are two-dimensional counterparts to the one-dimensional diagrams of PRGT will be introduced. The gluing of surfaces with boundaries will be presented as the means to represent auto-relative and relative multiplication. |
III. Peircean Relational Surface Theory
Employing some insights of such pioneers in topology as A.F. Möbius and Max Dehn, three surface models for Peirce’s logic of relations will be explored, specifically, 1.) a cap/sleeve/pair of pants model, 2.) a model of spheres with one, two, and three discs excised, and 3.) a disc/annulus/bi-annulus model. While a disc, an annulus, and a bi-annulus are homotopically distinct from each other, the above three models are homotopically equivalent. This will be diagrammatically displayed and algebraically demonstrated. A problem with using these surface models to represent Peirce’s logic of relations will be discussed and then solved, involving the use of deformation retractions of the disc, the annulus, and the bi-annulus as necessary aspects of an adequate model Peirce’s logic of relations in two dimensions. Selected Bibliography
Useful links
Charles Peirce Society www.peirce.org/ Centro de Sistemática Peirceana: Grupo de Estudios Peirceano: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism: Helsinki Peirce Research Centre: Centro de Estudos de Pragmatismo, São Paulo, Brasil Charles Sanders Peirce: Logic, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Back to the 6th Universal Logic School ! |